Marketers and merchandisers in enterprise retail are often stuck in a weird paradox: they have powerful ideas, agile teams, and massive goals, but a tech stack that moves like it's 2012. If launching a promo takes 3 JIRA tickets and 2 weeks of dev time, you're not just behind, you're bleeding money.

Enter composable commerce: a modular, API-first approach to building digital storefronts. While it sounds like a developer’s dream (and it is), the biggest wins actually show up for marketers and merchants.

Here’s how.

Composable means your frontend is decoupled from your backend. So when merch or marketing wants to:

...they can do it without dev involvement (or with minimal support). Teams can use low-code/no-code tools integrated into the stack (like CMSs or visual merch tools) to make changes in hours, not weeks. And dev teams, before you get too upset, these guys have been using tag managers and personalization tools behind your back to do things they shouldn't for about 10 years now. This is better-safer-transparenter than that.

🚀 Result: Faster go-to-market, more A/B testing, more wins.

Legacy monoliths often treat personalization like a bolt-on feature, not a core capability. Composable stacks let you plug in best-in-class personalization engines (we have hard-core expertise in or Dynamic Yield) that actually talk to your content and commerce layers in real-time.

Marketers can then:

Now, it better be built correctly by a partner who knows what they are doing. (cough). And that partner better be in the weeds with your team on what it has to do where (double cough). And you better be willing to out some work into making it work rather than think it automagically improves conversions (whooping cough). But a composable architecture does unlock all this.

📈 Result: Better CX, higher conversion rates, more data to refine.

Composable gives you control over your frontend experience. Sure you have, like templates with like Bootstrap n stuff that you can play with. But repeat after me - ISML is DISML. With composable you are a world of React and Typescript and kittens. You get to control how the site looks, feels, and behaves instead of being locked into the templates someone thought were state of the art back in 2014.

This means your brand team can:

…without getting a “that’s not possible with our CMS” reply from IT.

🎨 Result: Experience-driven commerce, not catalog-driven commerce.

Move fast and break stuff they say. Yeah, great advice for a 20 year old building an app no one wil likely ever have to use. We don;t get that luxury. Marketers and merchandisers are constantly caught between "move fast" and "absolutely don’t break stuff." Composable gives us a middle ground:

🧘‍♀️ Result: Less stress, more autonomy, more velocity, more control.

Worried about an old school Big Bang launch of composable? Don't be. You can put a full composable site out to a subset of users for as long as you want before you have to commit ? Don’t be. Most enterprise teams go with a split launch - maybe 5% of users to start. They iron out any kinks. Then when they realize how much the ROI will be if they switch over like right now, they switch.

You can go incremental of course.

You can plug in a headless CMS (like Contenstack or Amplience), run it headlessly within your legacy stack for a while, and prove ROI before ripping anything out. Or un composable with a new CMS in one region for six months to give yourselves some experience of both before rolling out globally.

🛠️ Result: Low risk, high reward — easy to minimize risk and you keep IT on your side.

In a world where campaigns move at the speed of culture and conversion windows last minutes, composable lets marketers and merchandisers do what they do best: create, launch, measure, and optimize without waiting for devs, approvals, or outdated systems to catch up.

Want to see how composable could work for your team? Schedule a demo with 64Labs and let’s talk real use cases, not just buzzwords.