5 min read

Composable

October 9, 2025

What Most People Get Wrong About Headless Commerce

Headless is a tactic, not a strategy. It gives you freedom. But if you don’t know what you’re doing with that freedom, you just end up spending more money to get the same results

There’s something about the word “headless” that sparks confusion in the ecommerce world. It sounds cutting-edge and futuristic, which is why it ends up on pitch decks and sales slides everywhere. But too often, the people selling it don’t actually understand what it means in practice.

Let’s make this clear: headless doesn’t mean composable.
It doesn’t automatically make your site modern, flexible, or fast. All headless means is that your front end is decoupled from your back end. That’s it. One API connection does not equal a transformation. The mistake most teams make is assuming that going headless will magically make their ecommerce stack agile, AI-ready, and future-proof. In reality, all you’ve done is remove the head. Now you need to figure out what to do with the rest of the body.

Headless is a tactic, not a strategy.
It gives you freedom, but freedom without direction usually means wasted effort, higher costs, and longer launch times.

What Problem Does Headless Actually Solve?

Headless matters when your front end becomes a bottleneck. If your marketing or merchandising team can’t move fast, test new experiences, or personalize content without developer help, headless architecture can unlock real agility. It’s not valuable because it’s trendy. It’s valuable because it enables speed, testing, and flexibility that directly impact growth. The biggest misconception is that headless is about technology. It’s not.
What brands are really buying, or should be buying, is agility.

Headless Won’t Help If You Keep Old Habits

Many brands go headless but keep the same rigid processes that slowed them down in the first place. Developers still control every page. Marketers still file tickets for simple updates. CMS changes still take weeks. That’s not digital transformation. That’s an expensive facelift on an outdated process.

If you go headless, you’re committing to modular thinking. You’re choosing collaboration over control. You’re empowering different teams to own different parts of the site, each using tools suited to their needs. That’s what real flexibility looks like.

You Still Need a Head

“Headless” doesn’t mean you don’t need a front end. You still need a presentation layer, ideally built with a modern framework like React or Next.js that your internal team can maintain. It should connect seamlessly with your CMS, search, checkout, and personalization tools. It also needs to perform under heavy ecommerce load while staying easy to maintain. Headless only works when your “head” is just as strategic as your infrastructure.

Don’t Build a Frankenstack

The goal of headless commerce isn’t to show off your API count or tech stack complexity. It’s to ship faster, test more often, and create better customer experiences.

Composable architecture gives you the foundation to do that, and headless is just the first step. You still need the right CMS, the right search stack, the right workflow, and the right partner who has done it before. Going headless without a plan leads to chaos. Going headless with a strategy leads to growth.

If you’re serious about headless commerce, think beyond the decoupling. Think about what comes next. Otherwise, you’re just the proud owner of a decapitated monolith.

Eric Holler

Eric Holler

Co Founder and COO of 64Labs. With a background in user experience, he unites project management, development, and operations.

Read more

All Articles
Why Salesforce Commerce Cloud Is Still the Best Enterprise eCommerce Platform

August 8, 2025

Salesforce

Ecommerce

Why Salesforce Commerce Cloud Is Still the Best Enterprise eCommerce Platform

Best CMS for Composable Commerce: Contentstack, Amplience, and Contentful Compared

September 27, 2025

Composable

Ecommerce

Best CMS for Composable Commerce: Contentstack, Amplience, and Contentful Compared