5 min read
•
Composable
•
September 26, 2025
Composable is less about where you start and more about stacking best-in-class services CMS, Search, Personalization, CDN, Checkout and orchestrating them with intent.
Let’s get the short answer out of the way: yes, you can. But it’s a bit like asking if you can build a gourmet kitchen inside a food truck. Technically, yes. But at some point the truck stops being the point. Shopify was built for simplicity and speed - a brilliantly designed one-size-fits all. If your brand is doing under $50M online, and you're not losing sleep over enterprise workflows or complex localization or how much the platform is starting to cost you with all those add-ons, then Shopify is a great choice.
Composable is less about where you start and more about where you're trying to go. It’s about stacking best-in-class services CMS, Search, Personalization, CDN, Checkout and orchestrating them with intent. It’s not a Shopify problem. It’s an appetite for excellence problem. And it changes who controls the pace, the priorities, and the potential of your commerce experience. But if you don’t want to get control of all this - well, composable on any platform is not for you. Neither is large-scale e-commerce in the next five years.
{{banner}}
You can technically run a composable stack with Shopify at the center. Hydrogen makes that eminently possible. So do third-party integrations, custom storefronts, and API-first services from nearly every part of the stack. But if you’re expecting Shopify to manage that complexity for you, or to support it the way it supports its native themes and plugins, you are going to be somewhat disappointed.
What we tend to see when we talk to companies who use Shopify in their portfolio alongside SFCC, are brands quietly inching past the limits of what Shopify was built to support. A headless CMS here, a search upgrade there. Then one day they look up and realize they’re running half a dozen tools, none of which really speak to each other, and none of which feel fully owned by the team.
There’s no red line that says “now you must go composable.” But there are signs:
The irony is that these were all the problems a templated SFCC faced while Shopify was making hay with the SMBs. But composable dug Salesforce out of that ditch because the scale of most of their customers makes it valuable as a rock at the heart of the stack, an anchor for all the cool stuff. Shopify’s business is always going to be anchored by their successful creation of a “good enough for most everyone” platform that is brilliant at what it does. But it doesn’t do complex integrations. It’s designed to meet the needs of everyone who doesn’t need complex integrations.
Composable isn’t a trend. It’s what happens when ambition outgrows convenience. The only real question is when you decide that tradeoff is worth it.
Some brands get there early. 64labs built its first PWA at Duluth, the first SFCC composable storefront build in the world, in 2022.
Some wait. But the ones who make the leap with clarity (about their stack, their team, their goals) tend to find themselves moving faster, experimenting more, and spending less time negotiating with their own tools.
There are different ways to do it. Shopify can be part of it. So can SFCC, commercetools, BigCommerce. The platform matters less than the intent behind the architecture. But whichever platform you go composable with, pick a partner that really understands how to engineer front ends rather than one that will throw your project over the wall to some integrators who reach immediately for the manual. You can mess composable up badly with the wrong implementation approach.
You’ll know when you’re ready. The question is whether the people around you will.
5 min read
•
August 8, 2025
Salesforce
Ecommerce
Why Salesforce Commerce Cloud Is Still the Best Enterprise eCommerce Platform
Salesforce Commerce Cloud (SFCC) has evolved from its Demandware roots into a modern enterprise platform capable of powering fully composable, headless storefronts. Today, leading brands pair SFCC’s robust backend with modern front-end frameworks like Next.js and Vercel and headless CMS platforms such as Contentstack or Amplience to unlock faster performance, better developer agility, and richer customer experiences.
64Labs is the global leader in composable SFCC builds, delivering projects for enterprise retailers such as Horizon Hobby, Moncler, Sweaty Betty, and Duluth Trading all with measurable performance and revenue gains.
Salesforce acquired Demandware in 2016, gaining one of the most mature cloud-native commerce platforms on the market. At a time when competitors still relied on on-prem or heavily customised systems, Demandware offered scalability without infrastructure headaches.
While its CMS and search were limited in those early years, its stability, global readiness, and proven operational model made it the Porsche of eCommerce platforms - engineered for performance, enduring in design, and able to stay relevant as the world caught up.
At its core, SFCC remains a stable, scalable SaaS commerce engine. It handles:
The real shift in recent years? SFCC now fits seamlessly into composable architectures, enabling brands to swap in best-of-breed tools while retaining a bulletproof commerce core.
This evolution lets enterprise teams:
Salesforce Commerce Cloud shines when:
When paired with a composable approach, SFCC gives brands backend stability and frontend freedom - the best of both worlds.
SFCC’s native CMS and search still lag behind best-in-class options. That’s why most of our composable builds integrate platforms like Amplience or Contentstack for content, and tools like Algolia for search.
Pricing can be a sticking point, but in 2025, negotiation flexibility is far greater - especially if you have the right partner guiding your roadmap.
Salesforce Commerce Cloud has come a long way since the Demandware days. It’s no longer just a managed backend for templated storefronts. It’s evolving into a flexible foundation for composable architectures, with room to plug in modern tools and scale globally.
For teams who need stability but don’t want to sacrifice flexibility, SFCC remains one of the few options that can support both. But to unlock its full potential, the architecture around it - including frontend, CMS, and integrations - needs to reflect modern composable thinking. And to get that, you need a partner that really lives this stuff. 64labs is far and away the leader in composable on SFCC. If you aren't being asked to bring us into conversations about your composable roadmap in some form someone isn't doing their job.
Thinking about building a composable storefront on Salesforce Commerce Cloud? We’ve helped some of the biggest names do it right. Let’s talk.
5 min read
•
July 15, 2025
Composable
Ecommerce
Monolithic vs. Composable Commerce: Which One Actually Lets You Move
Monolithic commerce platforms still dominate the legacy install base. But composable architecture is quietly and quickly becoming the default for brands that want to move fast, personalize better, and scale smart. Here’s why.
At some point, every digital team hits the same wall: is your commerce platform pushing you forward, or is it quietly holding you back?
Monolithic platforms are familiar. Everything in one place. One contract, one vendor, one roadmap to follow. That made sense when stability was the goal. But the game has changed.
Composable commerce is built for movement. It splits the stack into parts - CMS, search, checkout, personalization - and connects them through APIs. So each part of your business can evolve on its own terms.
This isn’t a backend engineering preference. It’s a strategic foundation for shipping faster, experimenting more, and building digital experiences that keep up with the customer.
Modern brands move on short timelines. Product drops, geo-expansion, A/B tests, loyalty programs, AI-driven content - none of that fits neatly inside the old dev cycle.
Monolithic platforms slow things down. One small update means full regression testing. Teams queue up behind each other. Deadlines slip. Innovation fades.
Composable fixes that. You want to try a new CMS? Plug it in. Want to update the frontend? Do it without touching the checkout. Want to test two search vendors? Go for it.
Decoupled systems let every team move at their own pace. No more waiting for a single system to catch up.
There are still situations where a monolith makes sense. Simpler teams, tighter budgets, fewer moving parts. If your business needs one site and one language, all-in-one can be fine.
But once you scale, that simplicity becomes a constraint. You’ll find yourself spending more time working around the platform than improving your experience.
Composable takes more planning upfront. You need to pick tools, define APIs, structure your stack. But once it’s in place, you’re in control. Not locked to a vendor’s roadmap. Not bottlenecked by a bundled release schedule.
Say your team wants to relaunch the site, overhaul search, add personalization, and expand to three new countries. And marketing still needs to push campaigns live weekly.
In a monolithic setup, that’s a six-month program with a lot of dependencies and delays.
In a composable world, content updates go through the CMS, personalization gets tested in isolation, and the frontend evolves alongside the rollout. Each stream moves independently. That means fewer collisions and more shipping.
Monolithic platforms had their moment. And for some teams, they’re still good enough. But if your brand is growing, diversifying, or trying to accelerate, composable is probably the better fit.
It gives your teams control. It frees you from outdated timelines. And it lets your tech stack evolve with the business, not behind it.
{{banner}}
5 min read
•
July 15, 2025
Composable
Ecommerce
How Does Composable Help Marketers and Merchants
Marketers and merchandisers in enterprise retail are often stuck in a weird paradox: they have powerful ideas, agile teams, and massive goals, but a tech stack that moves like it's 2012. If launching a promo takes 3 JIRA tickets and 2 weeks of dev time, you're not just behind, you're bleeding money.
Enter composable commerce: a modular, API-first approach to building digital storefronts. While it sounds like a developer’s dream (and it is), the biggest wins actually show up for marketers and merchants.
Here’s how.
Composable means your frontend is decoupled from your backend. So when merch or marketing wants to:
...they can do it without dev involvement (or with minimal support). Teams can use low-code/no-code tools integrated into the stack (like CMSs or visual merch tools) to make changes in hours, not weeks. And dev teams, before you get too upset, these guys have been using tag managers and personalization tools behind your back to do things they shouldn't for about 10 years now. This is better-safer-transparenter than that.
Result: Faster go-to-market, more A/B testing, more wins.
Legacy monoliths often treat personalization like a bolt-on feature, not a core capability. Composable stacks let you plug in best-in-class personalization engines (we have hard-core expertise in or Dynamic Yield) that actually talk to your content and commerce layers in real-time.
Marketers can then:
Now, it better be built correctly by a partner who knows what they are doing. (cough). And that partner better be in the weeds with your team on what it has to do where (double cough). And you better be willing to out some work into making it work rather than think it automagically improves conversions (whooping cough). But a composable architecture does unlock all this.
Result: Better CX, higher conversion rates, more data to refine.
Composable gives you control over your frontend experience. Sure you have, like templates with like Bootstrap n stuff that you can play with. But repeat after me - ISML is DISML. With composable you are a world of React and Typescript and kittens. You get to control how the site looks, feels, and behaves instead of being locked into the templates someone thought were state of the art back in 2014.
This means your brand team can:
…without getting a “that’s not possible with our CMS” reply from IT.
Result: Experience-driven commerce, not catalog-driven commerce.
Move fast and break stuff they say. Yeah, great advice for a 20 year old building an app no one wil likely ever have to use. We don;t get that luxury. Marketers and merchandisers are constantly caught between "move fast" and "absolutely don’t break stuff."
Composable gives us a middle ground:
Result: Less stress, more autonomy, more velocity, more control.
Worried about an old school Big Bang launch of composable? Don't be. You can put a full composable site out to a subset of users for as long as you want before you have to commit? Don’t be. Most enterprise teams go with a split launch - maybe 5% of users to start. They iron out any kinks. Then when they realize how much the ROI will be if they switch over like right now, they switch.
You can go incremental of course.
You can plug in a headless CMS (like Contenstack or Amplience), run it headlessly within your legacy stack for a while, and prove ROI before ripping anything out. Or un composable with a new CMS in one region for six months to give yourselves some experience of both before rolling out globally.
Result: Low risk, high reward — easy to minimize risk and you keep IT on your side.
In a world where campaigns move at the speed of culture and conversion windows last minutes, composable lets marketers and merchandisers do what they do best: create, launch, measure, and optimize without waiting for devs, approvals, or outdated systems to catch up.
{{banner}}